There is a growing element of jealousy among the conventional higher educational institutions which has resulted in efforts to restrict intake in the ODL institutions in developing countries like India where they have gained increasing popularity over the last two decades. In my view restrictions on the intake are contrary to the basic philosophy of the ODL system. It is against the conceptual build up of the theory which seeks to guarantee the complete sovereignty of every individual adult to seek knowledge wherever and in whatever manner he or she likes to do. Parochial considerations should not be allowed to harm this great system of education, especially in developing countries where there are still large chunks of adult populace illiterate or semi-literate.

Territorial Jurisdictional Limitations: Another point closely linked with the above, is the move to impose territorial jurisdictional limitations on the areas of operation of the ODL institutions. It is against the basic spirit of open & distance learning to limit the area of operation of an ODL institution. With the growing use of modern technology, the problems of access, and to a large extent, of equity, can be overcome. How can there be any place for territorial limitations?

Can ICDE consider these two points on their merit and suggest remedial measures. What is needed, in my opinion, is to educate the rulers and the authorities. I am however conscious that this is not easy to come about in the near future. Perhaps involvement of top government authorities in the academic activities of ICDE may help to some extent.